Problem Set 2
Problem Set Guidelines
Problem 1: 1.3 #30
Problem 2: 1.4 #24 b)
Problem 3: 1.4 #30
Problem 4: 1.5 #24 c)
Problem 5: [Note: This question is worth more points than Probs
1-4]
Look at Vector([1,1,1]) and let
L=Span of (1,1,1) = {t (1,1,1) where t is real}. Notice L is a line
through the origin in R3 and we can graph the vector
in Maple (without the arrowhead) as:
with(LinearAlgebra): with(plots):
a:=spacecurve([t,t,t],t=0..1,color=red,linestyle=solid):
display(a);
Part A:
Find a vector w1 so that
{Vector([1,1,1]), w1}
is spans a plane P1.
Part B:
Find a vector w2
not on the same line through the origin as w1
so that {Vector([1,1,1]), w2} also spans the same
plane P1.
Part C: In Maple, use spacecurve commands and display
as above to show that all three vectors lie in the same plane but
no 2 are on the same line
[use different colors like black, blue, green..., and one display
command like display(a,b,c);]. Provide 2 different views of the plane for
printing - one that shows the 3 vectors, and another view of
the plane "head on" that shows that they are all in the sample plane. You can
click and turn the graphs to get different views.
Part D:
Describe all the vectors w for which
{Vector([1,1,1]), w} spans the same plane
P1 [Hint - linear combinations are in the same geometric space
so think about what linear combinations
a Vector([1,1,1]) + b w1
you can use that will still span the plane -
ie what a's and b's you can (and can't) use to span the entire
plane with Vector([1,1,1])].
Part E:
Find a vector u
so that {Vector([1,1,1]), u}
spans a different plane P2 through the origin.
Part F:
Add u to your graph from Part C to show it lies outside the
plane (turn the plane head on and show that u sticks out).
Problem 6: [Note: This question
is worth more points than Probs 1-4].
Concrete mix, which is used in jobs as varied as making sidewalks and
building bridges, is composed of five main materials: cement,
water, sand, gravel, and fly ash. By varying the percentages of these
materials, mixes of concrete can be produced with differing characteristics.
For example, the water-to-cement ratio affects the strength of the final
mix, the sand-to-gravel ratio affects the "workability" of the mix, and the
fly-ash-to-cement ratio affects the durability. Since different jobs
require concrete with different characteristics, it is important to be
able to produce custom mixes.
Assume you are the manager of a building supply company and plan to keep
on hand three basic mixes of concrete from which you will formulate
custom mixes for your customers. The basic mixes have the following
characteristics:
| Super-Strong Type S |
All-Purpose Type A | Long-Life Type L |
Cement | 20 | 18 | 12 |
Water | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Sand | 20 | 25 | 15 |
Gravel | 10 | 5 | 15 |
Fly ash | 0 | 2 | 8 |
Each measuring scoop of any mix weighs 60g, and the numbers in the table above
give the breakdown by grams of the components of the mix. Custom mixes
are made by combining the three basic mixes using weights that are
some part of a scoop (perhaps even microscopic amounts).
For example, a custom mix
might have 10 scoops of Type S, 14 of Type A, and .001 of Type L.
We can represent any mixture by a vector [c,w,s,g,f] in R5
representing the amounts of cement, water, sand, gravel, and fly ash
in the final mix.
Part A: Give a practical interpretation to the linear combination
3S+5A+2L by discussing the resulting strength (low
water to cement ratio), workability (high sand to gravel ratio), and
durability (high fly ash to cement ratio) of the mix and comparing it to
those of S,A and L.
Part B: What does Span{S,A,L} = {a S + b A + c L where a, b, and c are
real numbers} represent in this context?
Part C: A customer requests 6 kg of (6000 g) of a custom mix with the
following proportions of cement, water, sand, gravel, and fly ash:
16:10:21:9:4
Is it possible to make using only S, A and L? If so,
find the number of scoops of the basic mixes (S, A, and L) needed to create
this mix.
Part D: If there is a solution in Part C, is the solution unique? Explain.
Part E: Let V=Vector([16,10,21,9,4]). Is {S, A, L, V}
linearly independent?
Explain.
Part F: Let U=Vector([12,12,12,12,12]).
Show that {S,A,L,U} is a linearly independent set of vectors by showing work
using the definition of l.i. and explaining. What practical
advantage does that have?
Part G: Define a fifth basic mix W to add to {S,A,L,U} such that any
custom mixture can be expressed as a linear combination of the set of mixes
{S,A,L,U,W}, and show (and explain) why this works.
Part H: Why will there still be mixes that cannot be physically be
produced from this set of five basic mixes? Give an example where this happens.
I'll be posting responses to select ASULearn messages I receive from the
class in the forum on ASULearn -
so look there for hints and suggestions.
A Review of Various Maple Commands:
> with(LinearAlgebra): with(plots):
> A:=Matrix([[-1,2,1,-1],[2,4,-7,-8],[4,7,-3,3]]);
> ReducedRowEchelonForm(A);
> GaussianElimination(A); (only for augmented
matrices with unknown variables like
k or a, b, c in the augmented matrix)
> Vector([1,2,3]);
> A.B;
> A+B;
> B-A;
> 3*A;
> A^3;
> evalf(M) (decimal approximation of M)
> spacecurve({[4*t,7*t,3*t,t=0..1],[-1*t,2*t,6*t,t=0..1]},color=red, thickness=2); plot vectors as line segments in R3
(ie the columns of matrices) to show whether the the columns are in the same plane,
etc.
> implicitplot({2*x+4*y-2,5*x-3*y-1}, x=-1..1, y=-1..1);
> implicitplot3d({x+2*y+3*z-3,2*x-y-4*z-1,x+y+z-2},x=-4..4,y=-4..4,z=-4..4);
plot equations of planes in R^3 (rows of augmented matrices) to look
at the geometry of the intersection of the rows (ie 3 planes intersect in
a point, a line, a plane, or no common points)
> display(a,b,c);
if plots are set to variables (careful to end those with
a colon instead of semi-colon) like a:=implicitplot(...):
then this will display them on the same plot